musictore.blogg.se

Docker vs vagrant
Docker vs vagrant











  1. DOCKER VS VAGRANT FOR MAC
  2. DOCKER VS VAGRANT INSTALL
  3. DOCKER VS VAGRANT UPGRADE

DOCKER VS VAGRANT FOR MAC

Starting with the beta program and Docker v1.12, Docker for Mac and Docker for Windows are available as native apps and the better choice for this use case on newer desktops and laptops.” This was formerly known as boot2docker.

  • Docker Machine “was the only way to run Docker on Mac or Windows previous to Docker v1.12.
  • It’s pretty convenient if only to grab and copy those long container IDs.
  • The Kitematic desktop client does a lot of you’d do with Vagrant to provision your VMs, with a GUI that integrates with Docker Hub where images can be found to instantiate containers from.
  • what you’d do with Vagrantfiles and Puphpet. Compose was introduced as a follow-up to Fig in February 2015. In other words this handles orchestration, i.e. Then, using a single command, you create and start all the services from your configuration.” With a dockerfile you define your app’s environment, while docker-compose.yml defines the services that make up your app. With Compose, you use a Compose file to configure your application’s services.

    docker vs vagrant

    Docker Compose “is a tool for defining and running multi-container Docker applications.Docker Engine “is a lightweight runtime and robust tooling that builds and runs your Docker containers.” The core.Still, if you don’t have Hyper-V or want to keep using virtual machines, Docker Engine, Compose, Machine, and Kitematic, as well as Oracle VM VirtualBox, are packaged as an installer dubbed Docker Toolbox ( August 2015 launch) which includes the following components:

    DOCKER VS VAGRANT INSTALL

    Using Hyper-V rather than VirtualBox is advertised as “faster and more reliable”, and indeed in my experience it is much faster to install images and get them running than reaching the functional equivalent with the Vagrant/VirtualBox combo. However it requires at least Windows 10 Pro because Hyper-V virtualization is not available in Windows Home. The product known as Docker for Windows ( July 2016 launch) has become Docker’s recommended desktop offering since it got out of private beta. You’ll find plenty of practical tips to address the kind of pesky issues you run into when you really try to get a whole stack working, as opposed to just kicking the tires with a couple containers that don’t do much.Ĥ.8.

    docker vs vagrant

    I’ve been reading about Docker to wrap my head around this ecosystem, and now that I’ve started using it here are my notes, updated on an ongoing basis as I go through a bunch of research/trial/error/fix phases. has been gobbling components with the acquisition of Kitematic, Tutum (now Docker Cloud) and other projects.

    docker vs vagrant

    At the time there were significant practical differences between Vagrant and Docker, but since then they’ve been moving towards each other – functionally if not in strict architectural terms – as Docker Inc.

    DOCKER VS VAGRANT UPGRADE

    I started using Vagrant to develop Linux-based websites on my Windows desktop in 2014, as an upgrade from running XAMPP. Warning: this entry is pretty old, probably obsolete in many ways, and I’m not updating it as I’m now running Docker on my Synology NAS.













    Docker vs vagrant